Well, no evidence (AFAIK) of interfering based on releasing “hacked” information.
There does seem to be some new evidence, fairly ludicrous IMO, that somebody in Russia spent around $50,000 and somehow outperformed the millions Hillary spent.
And the evidence that one or both of the “hacks” of the DNC were performed by official Russian government agencies, while far from conclusive, does exist.
I recently found an article that somewhat expresses my own view of the whole Russia thing. STOLYPIN: Russia has no grand plans, but lots of ‘adhocrats’. IMO they’ve missed the recent evidence that Guccifer 2.0 had nothing to do with “Russian hackers”, but their approach is highly relevant to the current “facebook ads” flap.